Eldredge Law Firm
Free Initial Consultation
Call Now
682-990-2073
Menu Contact
View Our Practice Areas

Default Template

On Monday, January 30, a jury in a Delaware district court issued a $28 million verdict in favor of Evonik Degussa GmbH. Its competitor, Materia Inc., was found guilty of infringing Evonik's U.S. Patent No. 7,378,528.

Evonik's website describes itself as "one of the world's leading specialty chemical companies," and claims that in 2015 it generated sales around €13.5 billion (approximately $14.5 billion U.S.). Similarly, Materia "develops and manufactures catalysts and advance materials" for "chemical, electronic, energy, industrial, pharmaceutical, and transportation companies." These two companies would certainly have a significant amount of overlap in the types of technology they would utilize.

Evonik's patent covers technology relating to metathesis catalysts. These types of catalysts are common in petroleum reformation, pharmaceutical drugs, and other specialized compounds. These catalysts essentially aid a relatively simple reaction that is favored because it results in very little hazardous waste and by-products.

This suit was originally filed in 2009, and after eight years has finally reached a (preliminary) resolution. Materia's infringement had been established in October of 2015, leaving two main issues yet to be decided. First, the court had to determine if the '528 patent was valid. According to Law360, Materia argued the '528 patent was too poorly described to be valid, but the jury disagreed. Following that, the jury was tasked with determining the damages Evonik would receive. Evonik was eventually awarded damages based on a reasonable 5.5% royalty determination. Although $28 million in damages seems like a significant amount, Evonik was pushing for even more. However, the jury failed to find the infringement was willful, which would have led to the higher damage award.

This ruling displays the importance of three things. First, as a patent attorney, it reiterates the importance of drafting a solid application. The jury had serious deliberations regarding whether the patent was descriptive enough to be valid, and if it had found otherwise Evonik would not have been able to receive any damages at all. Second, this case highlights the difference between willful infringement and non-willful infringement. Because its infringement was found not to be willful, Materia effectively was only penalized for the payments it would have made to Evonik if the two parties had worked out a reasonable licensing agreement. However, this penalty would have been significantly higher if the jury had found Materia's infringement to be willful. Third, patent lawsuits can take forever. If this lawsuit was a child, it would be a first grader. This suit was originally filed in 2009 and just now has reached an initial ruling in district court. It is also possible that this ruling could go up on appeal, so there is no guarantee the case has concluded. Stay tuned for updates regarding a potential appeal up to the Federal Circuit.

 

 

SOURCES

https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/886478/jury-awards-evonik-28m-in-chemical-bond-tech-ip-suit

http://corporate.evonik.com/en/company/Pages/default.aspx

http://www.materia-inc.com/corporate/about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olefin_metathesis

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn More About How We Can Help Your Patent

Email us for a response

Get A Free Initial Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

The Eldredge Law Firm is a Nationwide Intellectual Property Practice

We have convenient offices in Fort Worth, Plano, Mansfield, Allen and Arlington, Texas. We also have offices in Salt Lake City and Sandy.

Fort Worth Office
777 Main Street
Suite 600
Fort Worth, TX 76102

Toll Free: 800-653-6423
Phone: 682-990-2073
Phone: 817-406-5919
Map & Directions

Dallas Office
8117 Preston Road
#300
Dallas, Texas 75225

Map & Directions

Sugar Land Office
3 Sugar Creek Center Blvd
Suite 100
Sugar Land, TX 77478

Phone: 713-234-1364
Map & Directions

Denver Office
7900 E. Union Ave
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237

Map & Directions

Houston Office
11811 North Fwy
Suite 500
Houston, TX 77060

Phone: 713-234-1364
Map & Directions

Albany Office
90 State Street
Suite 700
Albany, New York 12207

Map & Directions

New York Office
411 Lafayette Street
6th Floor
New York, New York 10003

Map & Directions

Austin Office
2021 Guadalupe Street
Suite 260
Austin, TX 78705

Map & Directions

Sandy Office
9980 300 West
Suite 200
Sandy, Utah 84070

Map & Directions

Dallas Office
3131 McKinney Ave.
Suite 600
Dallas, TX 75204

Map & Directions

Mansfield Office
990 Highway 287 North
Suite 106-199
Mansfield, TX 76063

Toll Free: 800-653-6423
Phone: 682-990-2073
Phone: 817-406-5919
Map & Directions

Allen Office
1333 McDermott Drive
Suite 150
Allen, TX 75013

Toll Free: 800-653-6423
Phone: 682-990-2073
Phone: 214-306-9771
Map & Directions

Denver Office
600 17th Street
Suite 2800
Denver, Co 80202

Map & Directions

Plano Office
5068 W. Plano Parkway
Suite 300
Plano, TX 75093

Toll Free: 800-653-6423
Phone: 682-990-2073
Phone: 214-306-9771
Map & Directions

Arlington Office
2000 East Lamar Boulevard
Ste. 600
Arlington, TX 76006

Phone: 817-406-5919
Map & Directions